🔗 Share this article

Iturns out he could survive defeat by Grimsby. He weathered a decisive European final versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, laying waste to some of the club’s most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to tango. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight right-back in Blackburn’s championship campaign, the coach came at the executive and appears to have missed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who frequently berated at his players for losing one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most feared sporting directors.

In truth, this whole bruising episode seems to paint the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted manager, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, he has proved himself to be among the sport’s true generals: a strategic mind of which United’s competitors are now justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Clash Over System & Philosophy

For example, it was the director who being involved in the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his favored formation. Naturally, these pleas faced pushback. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when issued from the mouth of a man the unimpeachable soccer background he possesses, holder of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to outline his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is walking away with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – individuals such as him – simply operate on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear is a series of ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not quite equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

An Supreme Authority Behind Command

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, merely executing the commands of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace data science and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he announced that the team's approach to football “will be determined by this group”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate football matters, leveraging his previous experience in petrochemicals and yachting. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally superior. Who else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of austerity, the building of a modern arena that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Soccer Order: Directors Over Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to go into a club and implement their plan through to completion. But how many companies have such individuals established? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to place genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the strategy in the boardroom and appoint someone who will adapt their methods accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more like delivery personnel: not responsible for the product, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to influence. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of literal children into Europe and wins domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his standing damaged while the people who appointed him live to blunder another day.

A Neoliberal Football: Accountability Only for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this represents neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without explanation. Hire the system coach and then fire him for using excessively 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and then discard them for requiring excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.